Outsourcing artificial intelligence (AI) development means hiring an external team to build or maintain AI features for your business. A team in Nepal can do that work, but a successful project needs more than a competitive hourly rate. You need a clear task, a way to test the result, and agreement on who owns and supports the software.
At Codse, we work from Kathmandu with companies in the US and Australia. This guide explains how to assess a partner, compare costs, and organize delivery. It is written for founders and business teams, so you do not need an engineering background to use it.

Location tells you where a team works. It does not establish whether the team can deliver your project. Ask for evidence of relevant experience and meet the people who will do the work.
For an AI project, look for three capabilities:
For example, a support assistant needs more than a convincing answer in a demo. It needs access to the right help articles, limits on customer data access, and a clear way to involve a support agent when it cannot answer.
Agree on meeting times using the actual cities and working hours of both teams. Nepal uses UTC+5:45 throughout the year. Some US and Australian locations change their clocks for daylight saving, which can change your meeting overlap.
These are useful starting points for planning:
| Your team’s location | What to plan for |
|---|---|
| Australia | Check the overlap between your local working day and Kathmandu’s; it varies by city |
| US East or Central | Set a regular window for questions, decisions, and reviews |
| US West | Expect limited overlap during standard office hours and document handoffs clearly |
When the teams work at different times, written handoffs become especially important. Each handoff should state what changed, what needs review, and which questions are blocking progress. Assign someone on your side to answer those questions.
Do not assume that an overnight handoff gives you round-the-clock support. Agree separately on who responds to urgent incidents and at what times.
Start with work you can describe and evaluate. Suitable examples include:
| Project | What it does | How you might check it |
|---|---|---|
| Support assistant | Drafts replies using approved help content | Review accuracy and the time needed to approve a reply |
| Document search | Finds relevant passages and uses them to answer questions | Check source relevance and whether answers match the documents |
| Document processing | Extracts fields from invoices or forms | Compare extracted values with reviewed examples |
| Request routing | Sends incoming requests to the right team | Measure correct routing and missed urgent requests |
A system that searches documents before generating an answer is often called retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). If a vendor proposes RAG, ask which documents it will search and how the team will check the answers.
Keep ownership of product priorities, sensitive-data decisions, and success criteria within your business. An external team can help shape those decisions, but someone on your side must be accountable for them.
If the problem is still unclear, start with a short discovery project. Its result should be a defined use case, a data-access plan, and an estimate for the next stage. Our AI integration services can help with that preparation.
Use written quotes for the same scope. Broad country-level price ranges cannot tell you what your project will cost, and an hourly rate does not show how much work remains after delivery.
Ask each partner to separate these costs:
| Cost | What to ask |
|---|---|
| Discovery and design | What decisions and documents will we receive? |
| Development | Which features and system connections are included? |
| Testing | Who checks AI quality, security, and core user actions? |
| Release and handover | Are setup instructions, training, and launch support included? |
| Running costs | What will models, hosting, storage, and monitoring cost at our expected usage? |
| Maintenance | What support is included, and how are changes priced? |
Request the currency, taxes, payment schedule, exclusions, and process for approving extra work. If the quote includes AI service usage, ask what usage assumptions it makes.
A cheaper project can cost more overall if your team must redo the work. Compare the cost of reaching an agreed, tested milestone, including your own review time and likely support needs. Ask vendors to explain any claimed savings rather than treating them as guaranteed.
There are three common ways to organize an engagement:
Agree on a specific result, a price, and acceptance criteria: the checks the work must pass before you accept it. This works best when the task is understood and you can provide the required data and system access.
For example, the scope might be “extract these five fields from this set of invoice formats.” Agree in advance on how the team will handle additional formats or changed requirements.
Reserve a small team for ongoing product work. The team learns your software and business over time, which helps when priorities change regularly.
This model needs a steady supply of useful work and an available decision-maker on your side. Confirm the team’s roles, availability, and responsibilities before committing to a monthly fee.
Start with a limited paid project, then decide whether to continue with the same team. A pilot lets you assess delivery, communication, and handover before making a larger commitment.
Define the decision at the end of the pilot: continue, revise the approach, or stop. Payment for a pilot should buy a useful result even if you choose not to proceed.
“Production-ready” should mean ready for the intended users under agreed conditions. Put those conditions in writing.
For a support assistant, acceptance criteria could cover:
During development, schedule regular demonstrations of working software. Use a staging environment, a separate test version of the system, so your team can review changes before customers receive them.
Ask the partner to document important design choices and automate checks for critical user actions. AI quality tests should run again when the model, instructions, or source documents change.
The contract and technical setup should make responsibilities clear. Agree on the following before granting access:
These agreements should cover the AI providers and other third-party services the project uses, as well as the development partner.
Start by identifying the information the system will handle: public documents, confidential business records, personal information, or health information. Map where that data travels, including model services and logs. Your privacy or legal lead can then review the requirements that apply to the project.
For US healthcare work covered by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), cloud providers handling protected health information may require business associate agreements and other safeguards. See the US Department of Health and Human Services guidance on cloud computing. Health-related software does not all have the same obligations.
For Australian organizations subject to the Privacy Act, overseas data handling needs careful review. Australian Privacy Principle 8 addresses cross-border disclosure of personal information; responsibilities depend on the arrangement. The OAIC guide to sending personal information overseas explains the key considerations.
Prepare a diagram of the data flow, a list of service providers, and named incident-response owners. These give reviewers concrete information to assess before development begins.
Use these questions to compare teams:
Resolve unclear answers about data access or ownership before sharing sensitive information. A small pilot can help assess delivery quality, but it does not replace those agreements.
For a narrow pilot with data and approvals ready, the first month might look like this. Treat it as a planning example, not a promise of a production launch:
| Stage | Main work | Result to review |
|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | Define one task, its success measures, and permitted data use | Agreed scope and test examples |
| Week 2 | Connect the required systems and build the first version | A working version in the test environment |
| Week 3 | Check quality, failure cases, and expected running costs | Test results and a list of remaining problems |
| Week 4 | Decide whether a limited release is ready | Release decision, support plan, and next steps |
If the quality checks fail or approvals are incomplete, extend the pilot. Expand only after the first use case provides enough evidence to justify the next investment.
Connect AI features to your existing products, with testing and release support.
Explore serviceBuild and maintain business software with a team that supports delivery and handover.
Explore serviceYes, with the right experience, access, communication, and quality checks. Evaluate the specific team and its evidence of delivery.
Savings depend on scope, team rates, rework, running costs, and support. Compare written quotes for the same deliverables instead of assuming a fixed percentage.
Choose one task with clear inputs and a result you can test, such as extracting fields from a known set of documents. Keep a person responsible for reviewing the outcome.
Agree on ownership and licensing in the contract. Keep the access your company needs to operate, maintain, and transfer the system after handover.