ASO in 2026 looks nothing like it did a few years ago. Keyword stuffing still happens, but it doesn't work the way it used to. Both stores now care about intent signals, listing quality, engagement data, and whether your app page actually helps people decide.
If your ASO process hasn't changed since 2021, you're probably losing ground to competitors who have. We see this constantly with new clients.

Two things happened at once. Both stores got better at understanding what people actually mean when they search, and AI assistants started recommending apps before anyone opened a store at all. Screenshots started mattering for ranking, not just conversion.
The result: you can't treat ASO as a metadata exercise anymore. It touches copywriting, creative production, and content strategy. That's more work, but it also means the teams who do it well have a real advantage.
A lot of teams use one ASO checklist for both stores. This is a mistake. The stores index and weight things differently, and ignoring that costs you.
| Factor | Apple App Store | Google Play |
|---|---|---|
| Metadata weight | App name, subtitle, keyword field | Title, short description, long description |
| Description indexing | Keywords in the description have less direct impact | Google actually indexes description text heavily |
| Creative testing | Custom Product Pages, visual experiments | Store Listing Experiments with more flexibility |
| Review cycle | Slower, stricter editorial bar | Faster iteration, staged rollouts |
| Localization | Title/subtitle and creative matter most | Full listing text + localized conversion flow |
In practice: keep App Store metadata tight and deliberate. On Play Store, you have room for more long-tail keyword coverage in the description.
Good keyword research is still the foundation. AI tools make it faster, but they don't replace judgment. We've seen plenty of AI-generated keyword lists that look great on paper and perform terribly.
Before touching any tool, group your target terms into buckets: category terms, problem/solution terms, feature-intent terms, and terms people use when comparing you to competitors.
This keeps you from chasing high-volume vanity keywords that don't convert.
For each candidate, ask: how much demand is there? How hard is it to rank? Does it match what our app actually does? Will someone who searches this actually install?
Drop anything that's high volume but low relevance. Those keywords look good in reports and do nothing for growth.
AI is genuinely useful here. Generate a bunch of title/subtitle/description options, then filter hard. No unverifiable claims. No keyword repetition that reads like spam. Respect character limits per store. Keep your brand voice intact.
Every metadata change should be a hypothesis. Run controlled experiments and track impression-to-click rate, listing conversion, day-1 and day-7 retention, and keyword rank movement. If you're not measuring retention alongside installs, you're optimizing for the wrong thing.
This one caught a lot of people off guard. Screenshots aren't just pretty pictures anymore. They affect both conversion and discoverability.
What we've found works: each frame should communicate one clear outcome. Captions need to be readable at small sizes (test on actual phones, not Figma). Sequence matters — think about the story from first frame to last. And test against install quality, not just click-through rate. A screenshot set that gets more taps but worse retention is a net loss.
The biggest mistake we see is teams designing all their screenshots as a cohesive visual set and forgetting that each frame needs to earn its spot in the sequence.
Here's what's genuinely new: people ask ChatGPT or Gemini "what's the best app for X" before they ever open a store. If your app doesn't show up in those answers, you're missing a growing chunk of discovery.
How do you get recommended by AI assistants? It's less mysterious than it sounds:
This is where AI Integration Services and App Store Optimization Services work together — your content, your product pages, and your store listing all feed the same discovery loop.
Before shipping a major listing update, run through these:
Metadata: Title, subtitle, and short description aligned to your priority keywords. Character limits checked for every locale. No claims that could get flagged in review.
Screenshots: Mapped to actual user journey stages. Captions readable on small screens. Your main value prop visible in the first two frames.
Measurement: Baseline metrics captured before you change anything. Experiment duration and stop criteria decided in advance. Tracking install quality by cohort, not just raw volume.
Cross-channel: Landing page matches listing promises. FAQ and support content updated. Launch timing coordinated across channels.
| Phase | When | What you're doing | What you ship |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foundation | Weeks 1-2 | Baseline audit, intent mapping | Keyword model, conversion benchmarks, competitor analysis |
| Optimization | Weeks 3-8 | Testing high-impact listing changes | Title/subtitle variants, screenshot sets, localized metadata |
| Scale | Weeks 9-12 | Rolling out winners across markets | Multi-market listings, LLM SEO content, reporting setup |
The teams that follow a structured cadence like this consistently outperform teams making one-off listing edits whenever someone has an idea.
ASO work has a wide price range depending on who does it. Here's what we typically see:
| Engagement | US agency range | What we charge |
|---|---|---|
| ASO audit + strategy | $4,000-$12,000 | $1,500-$4,500 |
| 90-day optimization sprint | $12,000-$35,000 | $4,000-$12,000 |
| Ongoing ASO + LLM SEO | $3,000-$10,000/month | $1,200-$3,500/month |
We're cheaper because we use AI tools in our workflow and operate with lower overhead. The quality of the work is the same — often better, because we can iterate faster.
Keyword strategy, creative testing, and LLM SEO to increase app discoverability and install quality.
Explore serviceEmbed AI into your product with production-ready architecture, content intelligence, and growth automation.
Explore serviceStores now evaluate intent and conversion together. Metadata still matters, but creative performance and retention signals have much more weight than they used to.
Yes. Google still indexes description text, and well-structured descriptions with real user-intent language perform noticeably better than thin ones.
They influence ranking indirectly. Screenshots affect conversion rate, and conversion rate affects ranking. So yes, they matter for SEO — just not through keyword indexing.
When someone asks an AI assistant for app recommendations, your app either shows up or it doesn't. LLM SEO is about making sure it does. That's top-of-funnel traffic you can't get from store optimization alone.
You'll usually see initial keyword movement in 2-4 weeks. But real, compounding results take a full 60-90 day cycle with proper experimentation. Anyone promising faster timelines is either lucky or lying.